Un estudio retrospectivo analizó 651 pacientes con cáncer de mama triple negativo (TNBC) que recibieron quimioterapia neoadyuvante (NACT) y posterior cirugía.

Blog · ppj.es

Publicado el 22 de agosto de 2026

⚖️ Transparency notice: this article was written with AI assistance and reviewed by the author, a medical oncologist.

When the breast and the axilla don’t agree: discordance after neoadjuvant therapy in TNBC

Type: B (clinical / real-world) · Source: PMID 42624979 · Cancer Biology & Therapy / Society of Surgical Oncology, 2026

What the evidence DOES support

A retrospective study analyzed 651 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and subsequent surgery [PMID: 42624979]. The aim was to quantify how often the pathological response in the breast and the axilla do not match, and what factors predict that discordance [PMID: 42624979].

The authors defined four patterns by combining complete pathological response of the breast (BpCR) and of the nodes (NpCR) [PMID: 42624979]. The results:

  • Discordance is the rule, not the exception: it occurred in 30.6% (199/651) of patients [PMID: 42624979].
  • If there is breast pCR (BpCR): 17.8% still have residual axillary disease [PMID: 42624979]. That is: a “clean” breast does not guarantee a node-free axilla.
  • If there is NO breast pCR: 34.8% achieve nodal pCR (NpCR); in those who started as cN0, the NpCR rate reaches 80.9% [PMID: 42624979].
  • The consistent factor is initial axillary burden: higher clinical nodal stage (cN) means higher probability of residual axillary disease (all P < 0.05) [PMID: 42624979]. In patients without BpCR, initial cN was the only independent factor associated with NpCR (all P < 0.001) [PMID: 42624979].
  • Immunotherapy: associated with less residual axillary disease (OR 0.259; 95% CI 0.080–0.842; P = 0.025) [PMID: 42624979]. But era-stratified analysis could not reliably estimate it in 2014–2019 and was favorable but not significant in 2020–2024 → cautious interpretation [PMID: 42624979].
  • HER2-low: marginal association with more residual disease (OR 2.599; 95% CI 1.013–6.668; P = 0.047) — exploratory marker [PMID: 42624979].

30.6% [PMID: 42624979]

Breast–axilla discordance

17.8% [PMID: 42624979]

Residual axillary disease despite breast pCR

80.9% [PMID: 42624979]

NpCR if initial cN0 (without breast pCR)

cN

Factor that PREDICTS axillary response

What only promises or is investigational

  • The study is retrospective, single-center (Tianjin) and does not change current guidelines [PMID: 42624979].
  • The association of immunotherapy with less axillary disease is suggestive but not conclusive due to design (not all regimens included anti-PD-L1 and the subgroup is small) [PMID: 42624979].
  • The authors frame it as a basis for designing future axillary de-escalation trials, not as a practice recommendation [PMID: 42624979].

Lectura crítica

Critical reading. Three points to keep in mind: 1. Selection bias and generalizability. Single Chinese center; NACT practice and axillary staging may not translate to your setting. 2. cN is a proxy, not a biomarker. It predicts, but does not replace histological evaluation of the axilla. 3. The ORs for immuno/HER2-low barely cross the significance threshold and do not survive era analysis → do not present them as solid findings in consultation.

For the consultation

— Este análisis ha sido generado por ANGIE (Always Next to Guide, Inspire and Empower), un sistema de inteligencia artificial con perfiles SOUL, diseñado por el Dr. Javier Pumares Pérez.

Conecta en LinkedIn · ppj.es

Aviso: este artículo tiene carácter divulgativo e informativo y refleja la opinión personal del autor. No constituye consejo médico ni sustituye la valoración de un profesional sanitario. Si tienes un problema de salud, consulta con tu médico.